Chapter 23 of 29

Acts and Reforms under British Rule

A deeper look at the Morley-Minto Reforms (1909), Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms (1919), and the Government of India Act 1935, and how nationalist opinion responded to each.

๐Ÿ“– ~13 min read ๐Ÿ›๏ธ Modern Indian History

Introduction

While the previous chapter listed all constitutional Acts chronologically, this chapter focuses on the three most significant 20th-century reform Acts โ€” examining their exact provisions and how Indian political opinion reacted to each, a distinction UPSC often tests directly.

Morley-Minto Reforms (Indian Councils Act, 1909)

  • Named after Secretary of State John Morley and Viceroy Lord Minto.
  • Increased the size of legislative councils at the Centre and in provinces; allowed limited discussion of the budget and the right to ask questions.
  • Introduced separate electorates for Muslims โ€” Muslims could vote only for Muslim candidates in reserved constituencies, a step widely criticised by nationalists as sowing the seeds of communal division.
  • Lord Minto earned the title "Father of Communal Electorates" for this reform.

Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms (Government of India Act, 1919)

  • Named after Secretary of State Edwin Montagu and Viceroy Lord Chelmsford; followed Montagu's August 1917 Declaration promising "responsible government."
  • Introduced Dyarchy at the provincial level โ€” subjects split into:
CategoryControlled ByExamples
Reserved SubjectsGovernor (with Executive Council, not responsible to legislature)Law and order, finance, land revenue
Transferred SubjectsMinisters responsible to the elected legislatureEducation, health, local self-government
  • Extended separate electorates to Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, and Europeans.
  • Created a bicameral legislature at the Centre (Council of State and Legislative Assembly) for the first time.
  • Widely criticised by the INC (Congress passed a resolution calling it "disappointing and unsatisfactory") for offering only limited, unstable power-sharing.

Government of India Act, 1935

  • Longest Act of British Parliament at that time; based partly on the recommendations of the Simon Commission (1927) and the three Round Table Conferences (1930-32).
  • Proposed an All-India Federation of British provinces and princely states (never came into force as an insufficient number of princely states acceded).
  • Abolished Dyarchy at the provincial level, introducing full provincial autonomy with ministers responsible to provincial legislatures.
  • Introduced Dyarchy instead at the (never-implemented) federal/central level.
  • Established a Federal Court (1937) โ€” precursor to the Supreme Court of India.
  • Extended separate electorates further and introduced the concept of provincial elections (1937), in which the INC formed ministries in several provinces.
Flowchart โ€” Nationalist Reaction Summary
1909 โ€” Widely criticised for communal electorates
โ†’
1919 โ€” Called "disappointing and unsatisfactory" by INC
โ†’
1935 โ€” Congress rejected the federal scheme but contested & won 1937 provincial elections
โœ… UPSC Focus: Names attached to each Act (Morley-Minto, Montagu-Chelmsford) ยท Exact meaning of "Dyarchy" at provincial (1919) vs proposed federal (1935) level ยท Which communities got separate electorates and when ยท Federal Court (1935 Act) as a Supreme Court precursor.

๐Ÿ’ก Want More? Get the Full eBook

This free chapter covers the key concepts. For complete coverage with 500+ MCQs, mock tests, and previous year analysis โ€” grab the premium eBook.

๐Ÿ“š Browse Premium eBooks โ†’