Introduction
While the previous chapter listed all constitutional Acts chronologically, this chapter focuses on the
three most significant 20th-century reform Acts โ examining their exact provisions and how Indian
political opinion reacted to each, a distinction UPSC often tests directly.
Morley-Minto Reforms (Indian Councils Act, 1909)
- Named after Secretary of State John Morley and Viceroy Lord Minto.
- Increased the size of legislative councils at the Centre and in provinces; allowed limited discussion of the budget and the right to ask questions.
- Introduced separate electorates for Muslims โ Muslims could vote only for Muslim candidates in reserved constituencies, a step widely criticised by nationalists as sowing the seeds of communal division.
- Lord Minto earned the title "Father of Communal Electorates" for this reform.
Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms (Government of India Act, 1919)
- Named after Secretary of State Edwin Montagu and Viceroy Lord Chelmsford; followed Montagu's August 1917 Declaration promising "responsible government."
- Introduced Dyarchy at the provincial level โ subjects split into:
| Category | Controlled By | Examples |
| Reserved Subjects | Governor (with Executive Council, not responsible to legislature) | Law and order, finance, land revenue |
| Transferred Subjects | Ministers responsible to the elected legislature | Education, health, local self-government |
- Extended separate electorates to Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, and Europeans.
- Created a bicameral legislature at the Centre (Council of State and Legislative Assembly) for the first time.
- Widely criticised by the INC (Congress passed a resolution calling it "disappointing and unsatisfactory") for offering only limited, unstable power-sharing.
Government of India Act, 1935
- Longest Act of British Parliament at that time; based partly on the recommendations of the Simon Commission (1927) and the three Round Table Conferences (1930-32).
- Proposed an All-India Federation of British provinces and princely states (never came into force as an insufficient number of princely states acceded).
- Abolished Dyarchy at the provincial level, introducing full provincial autonomy with ministers responsible to provincial legislatures.
- Introduced Dyarchy instead at the (never-implemented) federal/central level.
- Established a Federal Court (1937) โ precursor to the Supreme Court of India.
- Extended separate electorates further and introduced the concept of provincial elections (1937), in which the INC formed ministries in several provinces.
Flowchart โ Nationalist Reaction Summary
1909 โ Widely criticised for communal electorates
โ
1919 โ Called "disappointing and unsatisfactory" by INC
โ
1935 โ Congress rejected the federal scheme but contested & won 1937 provincial elections
โ
UPSC Focus: Names attached to each Act (Morley-Minto, Montagu-Chelmsford) ยท Exact meaning of "Dyarchy" at provincial (1919) vs proposed federal (1935) level ยท Which communities got separate electorates and when ยท Federal Court (1935 Act) as a Supreme Court precursor.